St Helens Borough Council (STH) is located in the Northwest of England and currently has four main leisure sites which are operated by their In-House team. The Council had been considering the replacement of one leisure centre which closed in 2019.
Like many other councils, STH is facing increased financial pressures and, with leisure being a non-statutory service, the Council’s ambition was to reduce the revenue costs of delivering the services while providing quantifiable social and economic impact to the borough.
Following completion of a competitive procurement exercise, V4 Services were awarded the contract to complete an initial (Phase One) Leisure Options Review for the Council on 30th January 2023.
The key objective of this Phase One Leisure Services Review was to:
The target was to complete the report by 31 March 2023 in order that it could be presented to the Senior Management Team in April 2023.
The V4 Services team established a baseline for the true costs of the service which was agreed with the internal finance team. The actual cost of the services including interdepartmental or central charges etc. was found to be considerably higher than expected by the Council which will make the journey to cost neutrality more difficult.
The financials were also benchmarked against industry metrics for similar sized facilities, which evidenced the fact that operating costs are considerably higher than benchmark sites; especially in relation to staffing costs and central charges. The subsidy per visit was high and the recovery rate was low (percentage of operating costs covered by income).
As anticipated, several key issues emerged during the project across the following themes:
It was clear at the outset that, given the financial challenges, the ‘do nothing’ option is not viable and sustainable.
Transformational change is needed and so the report reviewed six operating models and scored them initially against pass / fail criteria.
Of the six options, only two met the basic criteria. Then these were scored against agreed weighted criteria. The options analysis concluded that the most appropriate delivery vehicles were either an optimised in-house service or transformation driven through a Council controlled Local Authority Trading Company (LATCo). While the LATCo scored the highest, the relative advantages / disadvantages of both options were considered in detail in consultation with the client.
Estimates of the potential income and expenditure for each option were projected to support the ‘’journey to zero’’.
Based on the evidence reviewed and discussions held, the strategic case to make significant changes to the current operating model for leisure included:
It will be during the Phase Two stage of work that the benefits of change will be quantified more fully.
To find out how V4 Services can help you with your next project, please get in touch.